Midterms come and go without a mandate from voters
The only “red wave” we saw last week was a massive selloff in the markets Wednesday, as the much-hyped Republican election sweep failed to materialize. First and foremost, there doesn’t appear to be any sort of mandate from voters. The fact that the current administration was not sent a stinging rebuke via a bigger loss will likely result in very little soul-searching and even less deviation from current policies.
Our leadership will also likely have zero desire to address current energy challenges, which could continue to hamper economic growth. There won’t be a serious attempt to rein in spending or reallocate funds to programs such as Social Security and Medicare. There will also be no meaningful reduction in regulations or the administrative state. What we will have for the next two years is political theater, with both parties fighting for time in front of the camera with the public.
With some races still to be decided, it’s up in the air as to which party will gain or retain control. If the House goes to the Republicans, we could see gridlock for the next two years. Normally that wouldn’t be a bad thing, but we have challenges that need to be addressed. Instead, the administration will likely view the results as a form of indifference on the part of the public with respect to current policies. They will argue that the people have spoken and that they aren’t upset with where we are.
But despite the results of the election, people are not in a good mood. In fact, many don’t feel the country is on the right track and have a pretty negative outlook. The issues we faced going into this election season won’t go away after the election, and we could miss the opportunity to address them. Many economists and market watchers are still expecting a recession in 2023. Once the reality of a stagnant economy with stubbornly high inflation takes a deeper hold, we’ll see how important it would have been to address the underlying problems that led us here. Instead, politicians will waste valuable time arguing what size of water bucket to use while our economic house burns down.
With the stock market, we will have some turbulence in the next six months as we digest the reality of higher rates and lower earnings. If legislative gridlock does happen, the benefits will be no new regulations or massive spending unless they come via executive order. Gridlock would enable markets to focus on making profits without worrying that the rules of the game or the dimensions of the playing field will change. Typically, this form of divided government is ideal for markets.
The Week In Review: Oct 30 – Nov 5
November 8, 2022The Week In Review: Nov 13 – 19
November 17, 2022Inflation takes a break
After the markets voted their displeasure with midterm election results by shedding nearly 650 points on the Dow and 80 points on the S&P 500 on Wednesday, folks were holding their breath for October’s consumer price index(CPI) on Thursday. Unlike the election results, CPI didn’t disappoint.
Expectations were for the year-over-year number to decline from 8.2% to 8.0%, with the range of forecasted outcomes from 7.8% to 8.1%. Everyone expected CPI to decline, but no one was expecting it to drop from 8.2% in September to 7.7% in October. That was all the markets needed to have their best day in well over two years. The S&P 500 climbed over 5% in one day and the Dow soared over 1,200 points as angst over election results evaporated and the old refrain of the Fed pausing and backing down took hold of markets.
So, has inflation peaked and has the S&P 500 hit its lowest low for the year? Right now, that appears to be the case. Be advised, however: If things change for the worse, we could go lower. But right now, we are at a logical place to bounce from.
Declining inflation was mostly due to lower costs for fuel, but supplies are still tight. It won’t take much to send prices upward, spiking inflation and snarling supply chains. This was why the elections needed to come in a bit stronger for Republicans; it would have been just the type of rebuke the administration needed to alter its policies. (More below.) Instead, we got a “meh” result, with nothing to cause either side to alter its path. For the moment, all is well in the markets, so enjoy this moment of euphoria.
Midterms come and go without a mandate from voters
The only “red wave” we saw last week was a massive selloff in the markets Wednesday, as the much-hyped Republican election sweep failed to materialize. First and foremost, there doesn’t appear to be any sort of mandate from voters. The fact that the current administration was not sent a stinging rebuke via a bigger loss will likely result in very little soul-searching and even less deviation from current policies.
Our leadership will also likely have zero desire to address current energy challenges, which could continue to hamper economic growth. There won’t be a serious attempt to rein in spending or reallocate funds to programs such as Social Security and Medicare. There will also be no meaningful reduction in regulations or the administrative state. What we will have for the next two years is political theater, with both parties fighting for time in front of the camera with the public.
With some races still to be decided, it’s up in the air as to which party will gain or retain control. If the House goes to the Republicans, we could see gridlock for the next two years. Normally that wouldn’t be a bad thing, but we have challenges that need to be addressed. Instead, the administration will likely view the results as a form of indifference on the part of the public with respect to current policies. They will argue that the people have spoken and that they aren’t upset with where we are.
But despite the results of the election, people are not in a good mood. In fact, many don’t feel the country is on the right track and have a pretty negative outlook. The issues we faced going into this election season won’t go away after the election, and we could miss the opportunity to address them. Many economists and market watchers are still expecting a recession in 2023. Once the reality of a stagnant economy with stubbornly high inflation takes a deeper hold, we’ll see how important it would have been to address the underlying problems that led us here. Instead, politicians will waste valuable time arguing what size of water bucket to use while our economic house burns down.
With the stock market, we will have some turbulence in the next six months as we digest the reality of higher rates and lower earnings. If legislative gridlock does happen, the benefits will be no new regulations or massive spending unless they come via executive order. Gridlock would enable markets to focus on making profits without worrying that the rules of the game or the dimensions of the playing field will change. Typically, this form of divided government is ideal for markets.
Coming This Week
AE Wealth Management, LLC (“AEWM”) is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) located in Topeka, Kansas. Registration does not denote any level of skill or qualification. The advisory firm providing you this report is an independent financial services firm and is not an affiliate company of AE Wealth Management, LLC. AEWM works with a variety of independent advisors. Some of the advisors are Investment Adviser Representatives (IAR) who provide investment advisory services through AEWM. Some of the advisors are Registered Investment Advisers providing investment advisory services that incorporate some of the products available through AEWM.
Information regarding the RIA offering the investment advisory services can be found on https://brokercheck.finra.org/
Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. No investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in periods of declining values.
The information and opinions contained herein, provided by third parties, have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed by AE Wealth Management.
This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis for financial decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the particular needs of an individual’s situation. None of the information contained herein shall constitute an offer to sell or solicit any offer to buy a security or insurance product.
11/22-2578521-2
Related posts
The Week In Review: Mar 5 – Mar 11
Read more
The Week In Review: Feb 26- March 4
Read more
The Week In Review: Feb 19- Feb 25
Read more